Office:
Address:
204, Monarch Chambers, Marol Maroshi Road, Marol Naka, Andheri (E), Mumbai - 400059, India
Email: nadkarnispc@gmail.com
Tel: +91 9820373895 / 9619608942
Monthly Blogs
Polymers are an impure mixture of molecules of different sizes and shapes. Scientists have developed advanced equipment and methods to understand the complexity of the reactions to produce polymers, the changes that the monomers undergo to convert into the desired polymers, and to scientifically evaluate and quantify the performance of the produced materials.
Drawing inspiration from Shikhin’s beautiful analogy of comparing epoxy curing to baking a cake, let’s explore how we ensure our “molecular cake” is perfectly “baked.” Just as pastry chefs rely on both experience and modern tools to create the perfect cake, polymer scientists have developed an impressive array of sophisticated methods to monitor the curing process. Like a skilled baker who understands the critical stages of their craft – from mixing to quality check of prepared goods – we must master every phase of the curing process.
Whether you’re working in a sophisticated quality control lab with state-of-the-art analytical equipment, or on a production floor with more basic tools, having the right monitoring tools and knowledge makes the difference between a perfect cure and a costly mistake. From simple touch tests to advanced thermal analysis, each method provides unique insights into our molecular baking process. Taking epoxy curing as an example, let’s explore these essential techniques that help us achieve the perfect cure every time!
Understanding Working Time
Before we even start our “bake,” we need to know how long the cake batter will remain pourable before it starts to set. In epoxy terms, manufacturers provide this crucial information as “pot life”- time window between mixing and application during which mixed epoxy remains workable before it starts turning into molecular concrete! This working window is highly temperature-dependent due to the exothermic nature of epoxy curing reactions. As a thumb rule, for every 10°C increase in temperature, you can expect your working time to roughly cut in half.Just like a skilled baker adjusts their process for kitchen temperature, successful formulation requires understanding this temperature-time correlation and planning accordingly.
Curing Monitoring Methods
Polymer scientists use two complementary thermal techniques to monitor epoxy curing. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) measures the heat released during curing, with its exothermic peak revealing when curing begins, progresses, and completes.
Complementing DSC, Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) continuously monitors sample weight throughout the process. Together, these techniques provide crucial insights into curing initiation, optimal processing conditions, completion degree, and post-cure behavior. Even when the surface feels set, post-curing through controlled heating, monitored via DSC can enhance final properties – similar to how a cake’s texture improves during cooling.
Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy serves as our molecular “taste test,” revealing chemical bonds forming and breaking. Functional groups have unique spectral signature peaks, allowing us to track their transformation during curing. By monitoring peak changes, we can quantify reaction progress and conversion. It’s like having a magical set of goggles that lets you see inside your cake as it bakes.
Much like monitoring cake batter consistency, rheological testing (particularly,viscosity measurements) track epoxy’s transformation from liquid to solid state. The rate of viscosity changes directly reflects the speed of crosslinking reactions, much like how quickly your cake batter stiffens tells you about ingredient interactions. While not essential for basic quality control, these measurements reveal crucial insights into curing kinetics, particularly valuable when studying reaction mechanisms or optimizing cure schedules.
Just as today’s professional bakeries have evolved beyond simple thermometers and timers, modern epoxy manufacturing employs a sophisticated suite of monitoring tools, transforming curing into a precisely controlled science. Imagine a “smart oven” for epoxy curing where real-time NIR (Near-Infrared) sensors mounted above production lines continuously watch the molecular “bake” happen, tracking chemical reactions with unprecedented precision. In-line rheometers act like automated consistency checkers, continuously measuring how the epoxy flows and thickens during cure, while dielectric sensors work like molecular-level probes, monitoring ionic mobility just as smart probes track internal changes in professional ovens. Modern manufacturers can even leverage portable FTIR devices for on-site cure monitoring, much like having a master baker’s expertise in their pocket.
Advanced spectroscopic methods like Raman spectroscopy provide a real-time window into chemical bond formation – particularly useful for carbon fiber composites – offering the equivalent of molecular “x-ray vision” into the curing process.
Evaluation of Curing Completion
Tactile evaluation provides initial insight into epoxy curing. Similar to the baker’s toothpick test to check if wet batter sticks to it, pressing your gloved finger against the epoxy surface reveals tackiness. When the coating’s surface is no longer sticky, initial curing has occurred. However, just as a clean toothpick doesn’t guarantee a fully baked cake center, a tack-free surface doesn’t ensure complete internal cure. This simple test marks the beginning, not the end, of cure evaluation.
The MEK Double Rub test offers a more sophisticated evaluation of cure progress. Using an MEK-soaked cloth, we perform back-and-forth motions (one double rub) across the epoxy surface. Like testing a cake’s structure by slicing, each double rub assesses the coating’s chemical resistance. A well-cured epoxy withstands at least 200+ double rubs (preferably 400+) without damage, indicating thorough curing throughout the entire structure – making this test particularly valuable for industrial quality control. However, this test is applicable only for durable coatings with inherent high solvent resistance.
Next, gel content analysis quantifies the percentage of epoxy that has transformed into a permanent, crosslinked network. Think of it as a more sophisticated test than touch check or MEK rub test. By using solvents to dissolve uncured material, we calculate:
Gel Content (%) = (Weight of Gel Fraction / Total Weight of Original Sample) x 100%
Like separating baked from raw portions in a cake, higher gel content indicates higher level of crosslinking and typically correlates with improved strength, thermal stability, and chemical resistance.
Quality Assurance: The Final Check
Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) provides comprehensive insight into epoxy’s mechanical properties under varying temperatures and deformations. It measures key parameters: storage modulus (material stiffness), loss modulus (energy absorption), and tan delta (viscoelastic behavior). The glass transition temperature (Tg), marked by a sharp drop in storage modulus and peak in tan delta, indicates epoxy transitions from rigid to flexible. The rubbery plateau modulus from DMA data can be used to calculate crosslink density, which directly correlates with mechanical and thermal properties. DMA technique helps predict how our “baked” epoxy will perform in real applications.
Tensile testing complements DMA by measuring critical mechanical properties: tensile strength (maximum stress before failure), Young’s modulus (material stiffness), elongation at break (flexibility), and toughness (energy absorption capacity).
While DMA and tensile testing offers detailed characterization, there are number of other basic tests that can explain coatings properties such as Shore D, König Pendulum and pencil hardness for hardness evaluation, impact test and mandrel bend test for flexibility, pull-off, cross-cut, and tape tests for adhesion strength, while lap shear and peel tests for structural bonding.
Once our thermoset is fully cured, TGA becomes our stability test, telling us how well our “baked molecular cake” can withstand high temperatures before breaking down – crucial information for high-temperature applications.
At the nanoscale, advanced techniques help us to map out whether the material has cured uniformly and if it has achieved the right mechanical properties throughout. Nanoindentation measures how hard and stiff coatings are by pressing a sharp tip into the surface and recording the force and depth. This precise method is especially useful for thin coatings, where traditional testing might not work.
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) uses a tiny, sharp tip to scan a surface and create incredibly detailed maps of the cured surface, revealing its texture, roughness, and any imperfections or defects you can’t see with the naked eye. It is just like checking if the frosting is perfectly smooth or if there are any hidden cracks.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) uses a beam of electrons to create detailed images of the surface of a cured material, working essentially like a super-powered microscope taking extremely close-up photos of the surface. This technique is excellent for examining surface details and identifying any gaps, cracks, or imperfections. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) is a representation of high-resolution camera to take ultra-close-up photos of your cake’s frosting. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), in contrast, sends electrons through an ultra-thin sample of the material, similar to how an X-ray works, allowing scientists to see inside the cured material. This technique is perfect for studying the internal structure and reveals how evenly components have mixed and distributed throughout the final product.
All these innovations ensure batch-to-batch consistency and optimal properties, just as modern bakeries use technology to produce perfectly uniform results every time!
The Perfect Bake: Conclusion
Whether you’re baking a cake or curing epoxy, success lies in careful monitoring and control. By understanding and utilizing various analytical techniques, we ensure our “molecular cake” is perfectly “baked” every time and ready for its intended application!
Additional reading:
Iryna completed her Bachelor’s and Master’s degree in Chemical Technologies and Engineering from Lviv Polytechnic National University. Subsequently, she joined Dr. Pourhashem’s Research Group to pursue her Ph.D. in Coatings and Polymeric Materials Department at North Dakota State University (NDSU). During the initial two years of her doctoral journey, she was engaged in evaluating the technological, economical, and environmental facets of biobased monomers through the application of advanced methodologies such as techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life-cycle assessment (LCA). She further explored the practical feasibility of novel monomers derived from plant oils in the development of sustainable latex adhesives. Currently, she is a part of Dr. Webster’s Research Group at NDSU, contributing to the advancement of biobased polymers and coatings tailored for real-world applications. Iryna's true passion lies in the exploration of innovative polymers that can compete effectively with petroleum-based counterparts in terms of cost, performance, and sustainability.
Other Blogs